GwinnettViews
What are your feelings Gwinnett?
What are your feelings Gwinnett?
Aug 11th
We posted several months ago about the increase in water bills that was coming: Watching-the-rain-fall-and-our-water-bills-rise. That was just on small increases to the monthly fees and not how bad it really is.
GDP Article by Jamie Ward: Water bills rise with new plan
Tiered pricing policies upset residents
The tiered pricing structure, which customers see on their bill as “Summer Surcharge Tier 1″ or “Summer Surcharge Tier 2,” has one goal in mind, Gwinnett Water Resources Department spokeswoman Lynn Smarr said: conservation.
“The goal of conservation pricing is to reduce excess discretionary water use, such as outdoor irrigation, by making water use increasingly more expensive,” Smarr said. “Conservation pricing encourages smart water use and helps protect our natural resources, all the time and not just during drought conditions.”
Confused? Following that? Us either. It wasn’t enough that during the drought that the residents of the county cut their consumption by almost 20% all on their own but now with the drought over the Water Lords feel they need to charge us into smarter ways?
Smarr said for summer surcharges to appear on a customer’s bill, the user must exceed two boundaries. First, for tier 1, they must exceed 10,000 gallons in the billing period and must have exceeded their winter average use by 125 percent.Smarr said typical residential usage is about 6,000 to 7,000 gallons per month.
Once summer usage exceeds 200 percent of the winter average, the price structure advances to tier 2.
The rate applied to each tier to calculate the additional summer surcharge gradually increases, too. In tier 1, 97 cents is the rate used. In tier 2, the rate jumps to $3.86.
Effective Jan. 1, a three-tiered approach will also be implemented in addition to the increase for the “volumetric charge” for each 1,000 gallons of water that passes through a water meter. The current charge is $3.86. On Jan. 1 the increase rises to $4.11. Then to compute the third tier of pricing for usage that will exceed 12,000 gallons per month, the rate used will be equal to twice that of the volumetric rate – $8.22.
That is just astronomical jumps in prices. People will be hurt by this financially and most don’t even understand it is going on. People be careful. Know that this can affect you. The need for revenue by these entities will make them think any plan is a good one.
“Our approach to managing revenues and our water resources is a tiered rate structure that will encourage conservation during peak months and during the highest demand period,” she said. “As a public utility, we are required to generate enough revenue to be self-sustaining, which means we have to generate enough revenue to maintain our infrastructure and to provide a level of service that optimizes value and cost.”
Mar 15th
So what does this mean? Since I read the article yesterday I went back and forth on my thoughts. Maybe they are taking their time to get it right. Then I laughed at that thought because of how bad the Old-New Plan was screwed up. Maybe they have have no idea where to go next. Seems plausible especially if you have no real new ideas and the Old-New Plan was screwed up. Maybe they are still trying to figure out how to spin all the other great ideas lately like the stadium and the new budget and the raise in water rates and they just don’t have time for this and of course they really know that the Old-New Plan was screwed up. So maybe they defer and delay and maybe people’s anger and concern will be directed in another direction like the stadium and the budget which in all honesty we can do nothing about. We have heard here on this site “it’s just trash what’s the big deal.” The big deal is the way our county is being run. The big deal is the decisions that are being made just don’t make sense. The big deal is the county thinks they know what is best for the citizens and from the things they have done lately do you really think that is true? The big deal is the erosion of my choices. Today it’s trash what’s next?
Let’s revisit the last meeting of the MBSCT:
What we need to think about is who knows better what is best for us at the end of the day? The BOC? Really? When the MBSCT was created we asked more than once for them to be sanctioned. However, after attending the last meeting of the MBSCT I am pretty sure I don’t want this group to be speaking for me. I had high hopes for this committee that they would come away from these meetings listening to the public and come up with ideas that would make sense and be some ideas that the BOC could agree was in the best interest of the people who live here Gwinnnett County.
My only issue with this one is that this is one more thing the government is mandating like we don’t know that picking up trash is important. Most of us are going to have trash service whether the BOC tells us to or not because we don’t want the trash to stay at our house. I am sure I am naive in thinking most people want trash service whether at their home or their business because they want their trash picked up. I really find it hard to believe that because someone does not have trash service that automatically makes them an illegal trash dumper. Again I am probably naive but I hope we live in a better county than that.
Where is the free choice of the residents in this? Again to hear the MBSCT say we need to go to a “One Hauler One Neighborhood” sounds great in theory but who is getting to choose the hauler. Not the residents. Yes I am happy the local businesses get the opportunity to bid again and stay in business but if I were them I would be wary of this approach as any. Why? Because what’s to stop them from getting undercut on their bid by bigger companies with more resources. What’s to stop one company from having more than area? What will that do to service? According to Commissioner Beaudreau having a SLA (Service Level Agreement) will keep performance high. What will keep the service at a high level is my ability to fire someone if I don’t like their service. Seems to me a business listens a lot better when you hit their pocketbook than if you hit their customer service line. I heard more than one trash hauler say this in the meeting. The ones that were there have no problem being held to that standard. For most that’s how they got where they are today
This is how you stop illegal dumping? Nope, sorry but if you think making something mandatory that the majority of the people use anyway is going to stop illegal dumping then you are losing it. The people who dump illegally won’t give a rip and will continue to do what they do. If you really want to stop illegal dumping then get serious about stopping the people who do it. Don’t interject the government more in our life and punish us because the majority of the county do what we are supposed to and a small percentage don’t.
The findings of the MBSCT were supposed to be presented today. In the end it will be interesting to see what their findings end up being. Will things change? There was nothing on the agenda for the working session of the BOC. Where will the county go and what decisions will the make at the end of the 120 days?
Mar 4th
I would like to suggest you go out to the county website and watch the meeting from yesterday that was taped. The budget was not passed with ease and the 4-1 vote was very interesting. We have been critical of Commissioner Beaudreau but yesterday he at least tried to stand up and say the budget wasn’t right.
“It would have kept us solvent, and we would have had a balanced budget,” Beaudreau said. “It’s regrettable that politics got in the way.”
We just wish he had been able to come up with alternatives before the meeting so that MAYBE some of the other members the BOC would have listened. However that did not happen and Chairman Bannister distanced himself from Commissioner Beaudreau on the budget just like he had done already with the Trash Committee.
Commissioners did approve a call by Bannister to move capital projects, including the opening of a Grayson police precinct, into future years. Beaudreau said the moves seemed politically motivated since three of the five projects were in his southern Gwinnett district.
Feb 27th
Sitting here on this rainy day where they are calling for several inches of rain this weekend. We know we are in a drought still and all of us welcome the rain. Then as I watch the rain fall I see the article on the GDP article by Camie Young where we will see a potential increase in our water and sewer bills by the July.
The proposal would only increase a base rate for water customers by 20 cents a month, beginning in July, but it would add a base rate for sewer service for the first time. The base rate would be $5 a month, said Water Resources Deputy Director Peter Frank.
So $5.20 a month here doesn’t sound like much but that’s $62.40 a year. Couple that with higher potentially high property taxes and it all adds up. Read the article because more increases are coming in the next few years in your water bill.
Thank you Gwinnett County for doing your part in the drought it is greatly appreciated. Your consumption of water has dramatically fallen over the past 2 years. Oh wait since you are not using as much water the Water Departments revenue has fallen. Well we cant have that. So what’s the answer. Hit the the citizens in the wallet. I don’t know about you but I am thinking of changing wallets because I think mine has a bulls-eye on it lately.
“It’s related to the financial situation. It will help generate revenue for us,” Frank said, adding that the big driver is the increasing cost of chemicals and power to treat drinking water and wastewater.
The Water and Sewerage Authority will make a recommendation on the rate change Monday, and commissioners are expected to make a final decision Tuesday.
As a side note the BOC is also voting next Tuesday reinstate the $1 fee for mailing in tag registration or decal renewal. They need to get it where they can get it I guess since today its not rainy enough to touch a rainy day fund.
Recent Comments